|
|
Archived Story |
|
Rural center gives
western Montana high marks for ‘amenities' By MICHAEL JAMISON of the
Missoulian
KALISPELL - Northwest Montana shines bright
blue on Sarah Low's map, the color chosen to fete places with the
most “human amenities.”
Those are things such as wild
mountains and clean waters, national parks and a high quality of
life, gauges Low used to help color her version of America's new
economy.
“In terms of long-term economic growth,” she said,
“it's real important to be talking about these things.”
Low
is a researcher at the Center for the Study of Rural America, an arm
of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. She was exploring
entrepreneurship - “what drives it?” - when she began to notice a
significant trend.
“Something that kept popping up over and
over were these natural amenities,” she said.
And so she
reframed her research questions. Why were lots of new businesses
sprouting in places with lots of scenic amenities?
“The
entrepreneurs are specifically relocating into these areas,” she
concluded. “They see a beautiful place with a great quality of life
- a quiet community, with skiing or fishing or whatever, and they
choose to do business there.”
It's a trend most western
Montanans are familiar with by now, a trend plotted by homegrown
economists at places such as Missoula's own Center for the Rocky
Mountain West.
But now the Fed, by way of Low, is confirming
this emergent economic reality. Her latest report, “Regional Asset
Indicators: Human Amenities,” concludes that both employment and
income growth are directly related to wild open spaces and a high
quality of life.
“Especially now that we have things like
broadband Internet technology,” she said, “amenity living is really
driving economies.” Retirees have always gravitated toward such
places, Low said, “but now everyone's getting on board.”
Her
map shows a broad swath of blue tracking down the Rocky Mountain
crest from Montana into Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, Arizona. A second
strip of blue spills down the Pacific Coast from Washington to Baja,
pouring inland to stain the High Sierra.
In Montana, though,
the bluest blue is centered on two natural wonders widely known to
be regional economic engines - Glacier and Yellowstone national
parks.
In between are the greens, the places with moderate
amounts of “human amenities.” Out east of the Continental Divide is
a big, broad patch parched yellow, where those amenities are hardest
to find.
Chart economic prosperity, population growth or
business diversity, and the color distribution would look much the
same.
And that fact got Low to thinking, once again, about
the scope of her research. She had looked first at entrepreneurship,
then at how entrepreneurship was impacted by natural amenities. It
was time to look at those amenities in light of their effect on
overall economic health.
Lots of the blue spots she mapped
were rural places that traditionally supported relatively low wages.
They were often natural-resource dependent, she said, places where
below-average pay attracted companies such as call
centers.
“But today,” she said, “the amenities are driving a
whole new kind of business growth.”
Question is, how to
maximize the potential? After all, she said, “you can't move a
mountain into your backyard.”
But you can invest in the human
amenities that most often translate into economic prosperity. She
cataloged five of those amenities in crafting her colorful index:
proximity to a national park, proximity to natural amenities such as
lakes and mountains, availability of quality health care,
opportunities for cultural entertainment, and the number of patents
per capita (often a measure of higher-education
opportunities.)
You might not be able to move a mountain, she
said, but you can invest in education, in cultural venues, in
protected forest and agricultural lands, in water quality, in
venture capital.
Doing so, she concluded, “brings a real
economic benefit to the community.”
Other economists have
reached similar results in their own investigations.
Four
recent economic studies from the Yellowstone area, synthesized in a
report titled “Gateways to Yellowstone,” concluded that “the strong
appeal of their wildlands and wildlife to residents and newcomers is
at the heart of this supercharged economic
performance.”
Per-capita income among Yellowstone's gateway
communities increased
33 percent during the 1990s. The number
of businesses increased 42 percent. Unemployment is at all-time lows
around Montana's national parks.
In her study, Low reports
that “population growth in rural recreation counties has
consistently exceeded those in other rural areas, as well as the
national average.”
Perhaps most telling, the Montana
“gateway” studies showed that a full 40 percent of business owners
operating near Yellowstone came to the area because of the natural
amenities.
It's simple, according to Low's research: “Human
amenities appeal to high-demand professionals who prefer to live in
a pleasing environment.”
The Yellowstone and Glacier gateway
reports both conclude that places with parks - places such as
Montana's Flathead Valley - have faster growth, more in-migration,
better employment, higher wages and more personal income than do
places without parks.
In Montana's “bluest” spots, business
is big in construction, in finance and banking, in insurance and
real estate, in medical, in legal, in software and pharmaceuticals
and biotech, and in engineering.
Those economists concur with
Low: People no longer follow jobs. Jobs follow people, and quite
often they follow them to gateway communities, where the latest
influx of residents has brought education, skills, capital and new
ideas to small-town America.
Of course, all that influx can
conspire to smother the very amenities that are at the heart of the
new economy. Roads can jam, views can haze over, houses can replace
habitat.
“A lot of communities aren't thinking about it until
it's a little too late,” Low said, “until there are a few too many
houses dotted across that scenic mountainside.”
Tools such as
open space bonds - Missoula has one on November's ballot and the
Flathead is likely not far behind - are critical to extending the
economic boom, Low said.
“It's smart,” she said of conserving
open space. “It's good for business.”
Lots of communities
focus on the immediate revenue from immediate development, she said,
but “you don't have long-term sustainable economic growth without
clean water and quality of life.”
For proof, she points no
further than that map of America, where Montana looks mighty blue,
but Detroit remains a dreary shade of
yellow-gray.
On the Net
To read
Sarah Low's Federal Reserve Bank report, visit http://www.kansascityfed.org/ and follow the links
to FRB's Center for the Study of Rural America.
To read the
economic studies synthesized in both the Glacier and Yellowstone
gateway reports, log onto
www.npca.org/northernrockies/gateway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
advertisement
|