billings gazette logo Contact Us | Subscribe Log In | Register
print this storye-mail this story (8) rate

Published on Monday, November 05, 2007

Guest Opinion: Lack of legislation for Montana wilderness imperils public lands
Will the most recent congressional legislation intended to designate new wilderness areas in Montana become law? Not a chance. Does it deserve to become law? No.

The prime co-sponsors of the bill, known as the Northern Rockies Environment Protection Act or NREPA, are a Republican from Connecticut, Chris Shays, and a Democrat from upstate New York, Carolyn Maloney. Their bill, if passed into law, would triple the Wilderness in Montana to a total of 10 million acres and add an additional 22 million acres of designated Wilderness in the Western states of Idaho, Wyoming, Oregon and Washington.

Many folks out this way are asking why Eastern representatives have introduced a bill to finally settle Montana's 30-year question about which of our remaining wild lands should be protected as wilderness.

That's a fair question. But here's a better one: Why has it been more than a decade since a made-in-Montana bill was introduced by our own congressional delegation?

The lands in question are critically important: assuring pristine habitat for the last of the nation's great herds of animals, protecting the unspoiled headwaters and basins for the Missouri to our east and the Columbia to our west, and securing Montana's landscape as our cash register, beckoning hunters, anglers, hikers and campers. These wild lands are what make this the last best place.

Only Idaho, Montana left out

It is wrong, if not downright embarrassing, that Montana and Idaho are the only states in the entire nation to not have satisfied the imperative of providing the ultimate protection of wilderness designation to the most important of our remaining wild lands.

Here in these two states of the Northern Rockies, 15 million acres of our soaring, sparkling landscape remain in jeopardy. The threats are from not only the inappropriate uses that would scar and degrade the land and waters, but the threats are also internal to us and our abject failure, year after year, to provide the appropriate protections for these places.

Yes, these are national lands, belonging not only to us but also to all Americans. Under federal law, the fate of these lands must be decided by acts of the U.S. Congress. However, the history of wilderness designations has been that the Congress has followed the guidance of those who represented the area, the states within which the lands under consideration were located. The Congress has, with Alaska as the lone exception, waited until a state's senators or representatives introduced a wilderness proposal and then followed the lead of that state's delegation.

12 years of inaction

But how long shall we wait? It's been 30 years since the first Montana-made wilderness proposals were brought before the Congress. Twelve years have passed since a Montanan has even introduced a bill to protect this place. Why do we delay on this matter of such significance?

No, the Congress will not pass the NREPA bill now before them. It is flawed in many ways, including changing the formulas for how our schools are funded through timber harvest fees, adjusting boundaries of our National Parks, and the virtual confiscation of private property rights. No, NREPA should not pass but neither should Montana continue to ignore the imperative of securing wilderness protection for the remaining wild slivers of the last best place.

Pat Williams, who served nine terms as a U.S. representative from Montana, teaches at the University of Montana and serves as a senior fellow at the Center for the Rocky Mountain West.

Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises.


What do you think?

Tell us what you thought of this story.

2.6 stars
Current rating: 2.6 with 5 ratings.



Talk Back!

Billingsgazette.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. By submitting a comment, you are agreeing to the terms & conditions set out in our comment policy.

If you have any problems with the new Talk Back! system, please email us.

Please log in

E-mail address:

Password:


Keep me logged in?


Don't have an account?
Get one here

Forgot your password?
Reset it here

The comments below are from readers of billingsgazette.com and in no way represent the views of The Billings Gazette or Lee Enterprises.




Flathead said 11 hours ago
Rating: 2    
We don't need any more wilderness lands.




Los Cangrejos said 11 hours ago
Rating: 1    
I'm against adding more wilderness because I'd like to see a Montana economy based on something besides agriculture and tourism. Locking up expoitable resources with wilderness designations closes up that "cash register" to anyone who wants to prosper at something besides the service industry jobs surrounding ag and tourism. I'm a cake-and-eat-it-too kind of guy and am utterly baffled that we can't find a way to even talk about this without a bunch of hysteria and nonsense.




dbw said 10 hours ago
Rating: 0    
Montana's congressional delegation is loath to introduce a "Montana-made wilderness proposal" because it would be political suicide. Putting their name on a wilderness bill would make Baucus, Tester, or Rehberg a target for an array of special interest groups (everyone from the mining industry to agriculture to sportsmen) and allow their opposition to tarnish them as an environmental "tree hugger." We can rest assured Shays and Maloney received plenty of input Montana's congressmen when they asked these out-of-staters to carry their water for them on this contentious issue.




George7 said 9 hours ago
Rating: -1    
Pat Williams is right. I spent my career in the Bureau of Land Management and US EPA. The political pressures on land-managing agencies to log, drill and develop the public lands are becoming so intense that nothing is safe. Wilderness designation is the best tool for protecting the wild lands we love. It's a way of steering development into areas of lower priority.




Snakes on a Plane said 7 hours ago
Rating: 0    
George7: Why do you think that is? Do you think maybe we need to take real steps to reduce our dependence on hostile foreigners? Love these wild places all you want, but with gas hitting 3 bucks a gallon, I'm more for drilling every day.




TAXED4U said 5 hours ago
Rating: 0    
Our Senators are would not be caught dead making a clear stand on an issue of this magnitude any time within 4 years of an election - which pretty well rules them out. And we never require them to.




MontanaFirst said 4 hours ago
Rating: -2    
Montana is at a precipice in deciding the future of our state. We can abandon common sense and jump off the cliff towards a Wyomiong like future or we can do something different. WE do need more wilderness and fast. Tourinsm is only going to get bigger in Montana as more and more wild land in this country are ravaged as "cash registers" for large companies which take the most of the cash with them upon completion of the pillaging. Do we really want to divide, drill, and conquer our remaining wild lands? It comes down to whether you prefer natural wild places or temorary jobs.




Snakes on a Plane said 3 hours ago
Rating: 2    
MontanaFirst: Why does it always have to come down to this OR that with you people? We don't have "ravage" anything in order to have an economy based on something more than "want fries with that?" But, as soon as anyone wants to even explore, out comes the rhetoric about wholesale destruction of everything within sight. It boils down to reducing our dependence on foreign energy while at the same time bringing in more high-dollar jobs to shore up the tax burden.




Stories that have received the most comments in the last 24 hours.



Back to Top | Home | News | Sports | Entertainment | Features | Opinion | Public Notices | Classifieds | Privacy | Terms of Use
Lee Enterprises Regional Newspapers | Butte | Helena | Missoula | Rapid City | Bismarck | Casper | The Prairie Star | Billings Business