Summit takes look at local-option tax
By CHARLES S. JOHNSON Gazette State
Bureau HELENA - For a local-option tax to win legislative
approval, it must reduce local property taxes, share revenues with
surrounding areas and be marketed as a tax targeted at tourists,
panelists said Thursday.
That was the consensus of speakers
at a summit in Helena by the Billings Chamber of Commerce/Convention
and Visitors Bureau.
The chamber sought to develop ideas to
build support for passing a local-option tax at the 2009
Legislature. A local-option tax, usually a sales tax, is one put on
the ballot by a local government that must be approved by local
voters.
Larry Swanson, director of the O'Conner Center for
the Rocky Mountain West, said local governments "aren't growing hog
wild." Some are struggling to keep up with the rapid population
growth.
"Many areas don't need this," he said. "That's the beauty of
the local-option tax."
If the Legislature authorizes local
governments to place these taxes on the ballot, Swanson said, there
should be flexibility in how the money is spent.
"Hopefully
this money doesn't get rat-holed in (local government) operating
expenses," he said.
Montana attracts 10 million out-of-state
tourists annually, but they pay little in taxes. "Where do you go
where you don't pay taxes?" Swanson said. "What are we
doing?"
Local governments and some business groups have been
pushing unsuccessfully for a local-option sales tax for several
decades to boost local government funding, relieve pressures to
raise property taxes and even reduce them.
Alec Hansen,
executive director of the Montana League of Cities and Towns, has
lobbied for passage of such a tax for 26 years. He explained why
it's so hard to pass this tax here, even though 47 states have
enacted a similar tax.
"Most of the Republican members of the
Legislature have the political fantasy of a statewide general sales
tax," he said, so they oppose a local-option tax.
And many
union Democratic legislators "promise their mothers on their death
beds that they would vote against a sales tax in any and all
circumstances," Hansen said.
Still, Hansen said, Montana
cities haven't given up: "We're as a patient as a wolf and as
persistent as winter."
Local-option tax backers must
emphasize that some of the money raised would go for local property
tax reductions, he said, and point out that 40 percent of the tax
would be paid by tourists.
He pointed to Whitefish and West
Yellowstone as towns that passed local resort taxes to fix up their
roads and reduce property taxes.
Sen. Jeff Essmann,
D-Billings, said he's given up on trying to pass a general sales tax
after failed attempts in 2005 and 2007 and is looking at a
local-option tax.
He analyzed the two 2007 Senate votes that
killed local-option taxes and found that all suburban senators voted
against it.
Any local option tax must provide for sharing
money with surrounding areas, he said.
Essmann said it's
critical that any local-option tax require a certain percentage of
money raised go to reduce property taxes.
He proposed calling
the levy "a tourist tax" and targeting goods and services that
tourists buy.
Bozeman City Manager Chris Kukulski said he
previously favored letting local governments decide how much
property taxes would be cut if they proposed a local-option tax. He
now believes the bill should require that 50 percent of any local
option tax revenue go for property tax cuts.
If Bozeman
adopted a local option tax like Whitefish on the same goods and
services, it could raise $7 million annually, Kukulski
said.
If half went for property tax reductions, the sales tax
would roll back local property tax rates to 1995 levels, he said.
Published on Friday, September 12, 2008. Last
modified on 9/12/2008 at 1:07 am Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee
Enterprises.
|