| |||||||||||||
|
Published on Sunday, March 04, 2007 Guest Opinion: Montana should join Western
primary
For too long,
the Rocky Mountain West has been a blank spot on the map of presidential
politics. But that's beginning to change, and Montana can do its part by
joining other Western states in coordinating our presidential primaries or
caucuses. A bill being considered in the Montana House would give us that
opportunity.House Bill 797, introduced by Rep. Duane Ankney, R-Colstrip, would give the secretary of state the authority to set the date of Montana's presidential primary to coincide with other Mountain West primaries or caucuses. The bill had a hearing before the State Administration Committee on Feb. 23. Whether this bill is exactly the right vehicle for Montana to ride is a matter to which we'll return later, but Montanans should not miss this opportunity to discuss among ourselves the best way for Montana to play its part in gaining a stronger voice for the Mountain West. Bipartisan push for Feb. 5The first thing to notice about this regional effort is that it is not a partisan matter. Last March, both our Democratic Gov. Brian Schweitzer and our Republican Secretary of State Brad Johnson, spoke out in favor of Montana aligning its presidential primary with other Western states. They were following the bipartisan lead of Govs. Bill Richardson, D- N.M., Jon Huntsman, R-Utah, and Janet Napolitano, D-Ariz., who had already moved their states into alignment on Feb. 5, 2008."We don't believe in the West that we ought to let Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina pick our presidents," Schweitzer has said, while Johnson has pledged that, "by working together with my Democrat and Republican colleagues in other Western states I want to ... make sure all voices are heard." There is justifiable concern in some quarters that Feb. 5 may become so crowded, with big states like California and Florida also considering moving their primaries to that date, that small population states like Montana would simply get swamped and ignored once again. Clearly, the front-end-loading of the primary calendar is now threatening to become so pronounced in 2008 that it might force the political parties (and maybe even Congress) to consider alternative approaches like a national primary or a rotating system of regional primaries, starting in 2012. If Montana was just trying to make itself heard in the presidential sweepstakes, it would not make sense for us to move our presidential primary to the increasingly crowded Feb. 5 date. We may almost as well leave it where it is now, in June, where we have no influence at all on the choice of either party's candidate. Regional cloutBut this is not about Montana (or any other Western state) gaining more clout for itself. The point is to give our whole region and its issues more attention.Westerners are already working to do that in Nevada, where the Democrats will conduct their presidential caucus on Jan. 19, between the Iowa caucus and the New Hampshire primary, and where they are planning a candidate forum in August, focusing specifically on Western issues. Meanwhile, the Western Governor's Association and other Western policymakers are planning their own candidates' forum on Western issues. If these and similar efforts succeed in getting presidential candidates to address Western issues like energy, National Forest management, or tribal issues, the simultaneous scheduling of Western primaries and caucuses will take on a new significance. Hearing Western concernsMost candidates still won't spend much time in states like Montana or Wyoming, but if they address our issues when they stop in Denver or Salt Lake City, they will be seeking, not just our few delegates, but a much larger number of Rocky Mountain delegates. Our part of the country would then be viewed like a big state and treated accordingly. But that can only happen if the states of the Rocky Mountain West insist that the candidates address our issues.Montana should be part of this united effort. Whether we do it by moving our presidential primary to Feb. 5, or by encouraging both parties to hold caucuses that day, we should stand together with our Western neighbors, unified to bring recognition to our interests, our concerns and our people. Bob Brown and Daniel Kemmis are senior fellows at The University of Montana's O'Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West. Brown is a former Republican secretary of state and president of the Montana Senate. Kemmis is a former Democratic mayor of Missoula and speaker of the Montana House. Copyright © The Billings Gazette, a division of Lee Enterprises. Talk Back!Post your
comments, opinion or feedback about this story.
The comment period for this story has expired
Comments currently hidden on this story.
All comments on bilingsgazette.com hidden.
The comments below are from readers of
billingsgazette.com and in no way represent the views of The Billings
Gazette or Lee Enterprises.
citizen wrote on March 04, 2007 9:12 AM
Politicians and newspapers (and broadcasters as well) would love to lengthen the political season because then they make more money.   Eric R. wrote on March 04, 2007 9:16 AM
If we change our primary date then state like NH and Iowa will just change theirs to be even earlier. Just leave it be wrote on March 04, 2007 10:05 AM
it doessnt really matter we have the Senator that chairs the approp., cmtee., that really all the politics we need. The rest is all dressing They're not coming to MT anyway wrote on
March 04, 2007 11:56 AM
As long as we have the electoral college, it doesn't matter when Montana has its presidential primary. If all of the western states have theirs at the same time, candidates will still be campaigning where there are the most electoral votes: New Mexico, Arizona, Colorado. They ain't going to spend any time here, and franky, I like it that way. Leave us alone and take your horrible TV ads with you. |
 |
|
|
||||||||||
 Contact
Us | Subscribe |
Comment Display Options
