Here today, gone tomorrow
- The fate of open lands in Ravalli Countyby GREG LEMON - FOR THE RAVALLI
REPUBLIC
 |
 |
A view looking out towards the Sapphire
mountains is an example of open space that could be protected
by the open space bond. REBECCA STUMPF-Ravalli
Republic |
It's a beautiful time of year in the
Bitterroot Valley. The season of heat and smoke has finally turned
the corner toward autumn. Trees are starting to change color,
farmers are harvesting their corn and the final cutting of alfalfa,
and ranchers are weaning calves and moving cattle onto fall and
winter pastures.
This is always a season of change for
Ravalli County and this year and new kind of change is in the works
- one that could protect the open lands in the valley that many
people find so valuable and still provide a way for local farmers
and ranchers to keep working their ground.
This November,
voters in Ravalli County will vote on a $10 million Open Lands Bond,
which if passed will protect the open land in the valley the
county's agricultural heritage, said Dan Huls.
Huls is the
chairman of the county's Right to Farm and Ranch Board, the county
Planning Board and owns a dairy farm north of Corvallis.
Because of the various hats he wears in
the community, Huls knows the struggles local farmers and ranchers
face in keeping their operations viable. He also understands the
pressure the valley is facing due to growth and
development.
The open lands bond could be a step in the right
direction in protecting the agricultural land, which in turn
preserves many aspects of the valley people finding attractive, Huls
said.
“This is a great opportunity for the community to give
landowners an alternative to developing their land,” he
said.
The agriculture study
Earlier this year, Larry
Swanson, an economist with the O'Conner Center for the Rocky
Mountain West, completed a study of the impacts of growth on
agriculture in the Bitterroot Valley. The study was commissioned by
the Right to Farm and Ranch Board and the Bitter Root Land Trust and
funded by a Forest Service grant.
Swanson's study outlined
the rapid growth of Ravalli County and the subsequent loss of
agricultural land. It also contained suggestions for tools the
county could use to better deal with the loss and protect
agriculture. And Open Lands Bond was one of the tools
suggested.
Ravalli County has lost about 41,000 acres of
agricultural land since the 1980s, according to Swanson's study.
Currently the valley has about 210,000 acres of agricultural land.
If the current trend continues, Swanson predicts that another 40,000
will be lost by 2020. The vast majority of this land is lost to
development.
Ravalli County's population is nearly 40,000
people. Currently the county is experiencing a flattening in the
growth rate, down to about 1.5 percent a year. That's a significant
decrease from the growth rate in the mid-1990s, which was 5 to 6
percent, according to Swanson's study.
But still, he predicts
that Ravalli County will have a population between 57,000 and 72,000
people by the year 2025.
Agriculture operations in Ravalli
County contribute significantly to the economy. Valley farmers spend
about $30 million a year in production expenses and bring in about
that amount in cash receipts from stock and crop
production.
But Swanson also pointed to the importance of
agricultural land that isn't reflected directly in the
market.
“In many ways the Bitterroot Valley, as with many
other areas of the Interior West, are becoming ‘amenity-based
economies.' Amenities such as nearby mountains, plentiful forests,
high-quality streams and lakes, abundant fish and wildlife, and
other features are becoming the foundations up on which area
economic life is being built,” wrote Swanson.
“Attractive,
well-managed farms and ranches and the relatively open landscapes
they contain add appreciably to these quality landscapes and are
attractiveness. As these lands are lost through development, many
times unnecessarily, many of these values are degraded.”
The
benefit to the community is mostly through indirect benefits,
Swanson said Wednesday during and phone interview. One indirect
benefit of open land is that people's property values are increased
because of the beauty of the valley. But the tension lies within how
growth occurs, he said.
If growth in the valley isn't
managed, then bad developments will push out good developments and
the amenities, like beautiful open lands, will be diminished and
property values will eventually fall, he said.
The Open Lands
Bond is a tool Ravalli County can use to manage growth, Swanson
said.
Huls and Bitter Root Land Trust director, Grant Kier,
took Swanson's study to heart and even before it was completed began
discussing with people in the community options the could use to
help protect agricultural land.
Without some incentive for
landowners to conserve their land, there's no way to get monetary
value out of their ground other than selling to developers, Kier
said. And the pressures on agriculture producers to sell land are
increasing each year.
Pressures on agriculture
The
Bitterroot Valley's heritage is rooted deeply in the ground.
Homesteaders begin tilling the rich soil along the Bitterroot River
in the 1860s. And that heritage is still evident throughout the
valley, said Swanson.
“It's sort of a deep seated notion that
these agricultural lands have value to the community,” he
said.
There are still farms and ranches around the county
that have been operated by the same families for generations,
Swanson said. The community knows this and still sees the importance
of keeping those operations and their land in
production.
“It's that feeling that this really is great
farmland, this is great land for producing food and it shouldn't be
used for something other than that,” he said.
But the running
a farm isn't easy. In a more competitive economic environment,
farmers have to grow or diversify with value-added products to stay
viable, Huls said.
And for many farmers, the greatest asset
they have is their land, he said.
“Everything that they have
is in that land,” Huls said.
It's like their retirement plan.
And currently there are no cash incentives for farmers and ranchers
to conserve their land as open space when times get tough. So it's
much more economically attractive to sell land.
“Their only
choice now, if they want to extract value out of their land, is to
sell it to a developer,” Kier said.
With an Open Lands Bond,
landowners would have another option to utilize the value of their
land.
The nuts and bolts of the Open Lands Bond
The
Open Lands Bond money would go primarily to conservation easements
on agricultural and other private undeveloped land in the valley,
Kier said. Participation in the Open Lands program would be entirely
voluntary, which would make it an attractive resource for many
people in the valley.
A conservation easement is a covenant
placed on the land that keeps it from being subdivided and
developed. It lasts forever, no matter who owns the land.
One
of the more positive aspects of a conservation easement is it can be
tailored for each piece of property, allowing for continued farming
and ranching and protecting the historical values of the land, Kier
said.
On the surface, a conservation easement is a simple
concept. A landowner approaches a land trust agency expressing
interest in putting a conservation easement on his or her land. The
agency who would services the easement has two appraisals done on
the land to determine the value of the land without development
restrictions and the value of the land with an easement.
The
property's appraisal without restrictions is obviously much higher
than the appraisal with restrictions. The difference in the two
amounts is where the bond money would come into
play.
Currently the landowner has to donate that difference
to the agency servicing the conservation easement. If the landowner
has a large income, this donation could serve as a nice tax shelter,
Kier said.
But most of the working farms and ranches in the
valley don't have the large incomes. Much of their profit is put
directly back into the operation of the ranch, Huls said. Therefore
nullifying most of the tax breaks available to them.
With an
Open Lands Bond, the money collected would cover part of the
difference in appraised values. The landowner would still have to
donate a portion of the property's value to the agency handling the
easement, but that donated money and the bond money would be matched
by money from federal programs, Kier said. The money would go
directly to the landowner, compensating them for their loss in
property value.
This concept isn't a new one. Gallatin County
passed a $10 million Open Lands Bond in 2000. It was so successful,
the passed another in 2004. In all, Gallatin County has protected
about 40 square miles of open land.
In Gallatin County, for
every dollar of bond money spent, the county was able to match it
with $4 from outside sources.
These federal grant programs
meant for protecting open land are vital to the success of the Open
Lands Bond, but they can't be leveraged without the
bond.
“The kicker is if you don't have the local match, none
of that is available,” Kier said.
If the ratio of federal
assistance in Gallatin County holds true with Ravalli County, then
the $10 million bond could produce $50 million to protect open
lands, he said.
In fact, in Gallatin County, because of the
ability to leverage federal grants, has been able to conserve open
land at the rate of $273.44 an acre, Huls said.
“I think we
can conserve a lot of land for $50 million,” he said.
If the
Open Lands Bond were passed, the county commissioners would appoint
citizens to an open lands board who would receive proposals for the
use of bond money. They would review the proposals and then make
recommendations to the county commissioners who would make the final
decision on what bond money was spent. Only after the commissioners
made a decision, would bonds be sold, Kier said.
Fully
funded, the Open Lands Bond would cost the average Ravalli County
Taxpayer about $30 a year, Huls said.
“That's less than 9
cents a day,” he said.
More to do
“A $10 million Open
Space Bond is really a strong step for Ravalli County,” Swanson
said.
This would be another statement from the citizens of
the county that they want a hand in determining how they grow, he
said.
Some of the other tools needed to compliment an Open
Lands Bond are in place, like the county growth policy. But others
are still in the works.
“Planning is as much sort of laying
out what it is you what to occur as it is what it is you don't want
to occur,” Swanson said.
The Open Lands Bond can be used most
effectively as part of a bigger planning framework that already
establishes such things, he said.
Karen Hughes, the director
of Ravalli County's Planning Department agrees.
“Right now we
have the growth policy which talks about the importance of open
lands and helping Ag folks meet their needs,” she said.
An
Open Space Bond would be a good tool in the planning department's
arsenal when looking at managing growth.
“I think there's a
lot of potential for it to provide yet one more tool we could use
and actually have some money associated to make it work,” Hughes
said.
But besides an Open Space Bond, the planning department
is busy working with the planning board on countywide zoning, she
said. Plus planning is going forward in the Old Corvallis Road area
and Corvallis area.
These local plans will likely include
zoning and could dovetail nicely into an Open Lands program, Hughes
said.
Other tools that can assist in managing growth and
protecting values are capital improvement plans, which define how
the county is going to address building and road needs; streamside
set backs and zoning.
And as people in the county become more
comfortable with land-use planning, there will be more opportunities
to look toward the future.
“I think there are a lot of
opportunity for proactive planning in this valley,” she
said.
Swanson agrees, even though he hears people say it's
too late for planning in the Bitterroot Valley.
Ravalli
County needs some smart and progressive land-use planning to protect
property values and maintain the quality of life people and enjoy
here.
“By conditioning growth you're really going to protect
property values in that valley,” he said.
For more
information at the Open Lands Bond, contact the Bitter Root Land
Trust at 375-0956.