|
|
Archived Story |
|
State's poverty rate
up slightly By TYLER
CHRISTENSEN of the Missoulian
More than 4,000 Montanans slipped into poverty
last year, joining a statewide demographic now more than 130,400
residents strong.
Montana's poverty rate increased slightly
last year, to 14.4 percent, even as the state's median household
income continued to rise, according to U.S. Census Bureau reports
released Tuesday.
With a median household income of $39,301 in 2005,
Montana was one of 28 states and districts in the nation to clock in
below the national average of $46,326. It was one of only a handful
of Western states to list household incomes below the national
average, along with Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico and
Oregon.
Seven other Western states - Alaska, California,
Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Utah and Washington - boasted median
incomes above the national average, while Wyoming's was roughly
equal to the national average.
One Census Bureau report also
revealed that Montana has the lowest median household income in the
region; surrounding states all claim annual household incomes of
more than $40,000. In fact, Montana ranked 10th from the bottom in a
national comparison.
Here's the good news: That's actually
much better than the fifth-from-last-place ranking Montana earned
just a few years ago, when the state's median household income was
$34,449.
The Census Bureau reports, which compiled data
gleaned from the bureau's 2005 Current Population and American
Community surveys, showed that real median household income in the
United States rose by 1.1 percent between 2004 and 2005 - the first
year since 1999 in which the nation's real median household income
showed an annual increase.
They also found that the nation's
official poverty rate has been holding steady for the past three
years at 12.6 percent. The Census Bureau used a blanket definition
of poverty from the Office of Management and Budget, updated for
inflation using the Consumer Price Index, that set the average
poverty threshold for a family of four at $19,971. For a family of
two, the threshold was $12,755, and for unrelated individuals the
threshold was $9,973.
New Hampshire had the lowest poverty
rate in the nation, at 7.5 percent. Mississippi had the highest, at
21.3 percent.
Montana's poverty rate of 14.4 percent placed
it 15th from the bottom in a national ranking. The state's poverty
rate has not changed significantly for years.
In 1979, the
percentage of Montanans living in poverty was 12.3 percent. In 1989
it was 16.1 percent, and in 1999 it was 14.6 percent, said Larry
Swanson, director of the O'Connor Center for the Rocky Mountain West
on the University of Montana campus.
“We're moving pretty
much laterally,” Swanson said.
Montana's poverty rate saw a
slight increase at the end of the '90s, a period of economic
deterioration, he added. The state's economy was restructuring for
fairly rapid growth in a new direction - away from an economy based
on natural resource extraction and toward an economy based on
services, health care and construction.
“We've had a
relatively strong economy in Montana, and Montana has had a fairly
strong income growth,” Swanson said. “What's disappointing when you
look at these income figures is that we don't have incomes as a
percent growing and then improving these overall poverty
statistics.”
However, it's in line with a nationwide trend in
which incomes are expanding - most notably at the upper end of the
wealth distribution chart - but poverty is not reducing, he
said.
The Montana poverty rate has traditionally tended to be
a few percentage points above the national rate - which, Swanson
noted, isn't adjusted to consider variations in the cost of living
and consequently tends to overestimate poverty in urban areas while
underestimating poverty in rural areas.
One Census Bureau
report found that, on a three-year average, Montana has one of the
highest uninsured rates in the nation. In fact, with its uninsured
rate of 18.1, Montana is tied for sixth place with
Louisiana.
Minnesota had the lowest uninsured rate, at 8.7
percent, and Texas had the highest, at 24.6
percent.
Nationally, the number of people with health
insurance increased from 245.9 million in 2004 to 247.3 million in
2005. At the same time, the percentage of Americans lacking health
insurance increased from 15.6 percent to 15.9 percent.
This
means that, at last count, 46.6 million Americans are going without
health care coverage.
The new Census Bureau reports also
include a comparison of earnings for men and women, and found that
men's median earnings were higher than women's in every state and
the District of Columbia.
Men in the United States have
median earnings of $41,965. Women's median earnings are about 76.7
percent of that, or $32,168.
In Montana, the gap was even
greater: The state's median income for men was $35,728, while
women's was $25,177 - or 70.5 percent of the median income for
men.
Reporter Tyler Christensen can be reached at 523-5215 or
at tyler.christensen@lee.net
New
CHIP contract means more openings
By MIKE DENNISON of the
Missoulian State Bureau
HELENA - The state plans to ink a new
contract with Blue Cross/Blue Shield to manage the publicly funded
Children's Health Insurance Program, creating as many as 1,000 new
slots to cover kids from low-income families.
The new
contract offers a “significant savings” over Blue Cross' current
price to cover children on the CHIP program, thus freeing up more
money to expand coverage, said Jackie Forba, chief of the state
Health Resources Bureau.
“I think it's great for uninsured
kids,” she said Monday. “Additional kids will be able to be enrolled
and more of our dollars will be providing health care for kids, and
less will go to administrative costs.”
CHIP currently
provides health insurance to 13,170 kids whose families earn up to
150 percent of the federal poverty level, or $19,800 for a family of
two.
Advocates for CHIP hailed the new contract as a step in
the right direction, but said the state can save even more money if
it would take over administration of the program
entirely.
“I'm very happy with (the new contract),” said Rep.
Mary Caferro, D-Helena. “(But) it's still our goal that CHIP will be
a fully public product. That way even more children will have access
to health care.”
Caferro and others have been arguing for
more than two years that Blue Cross, the state's largest health
insurer, was extracting too much profit from the CHIP contract,
keeping as much as 20 percent for administrative costs.
Blue
Cross agreed to return some of that money to the state, but company
officials said the firm deserved to profit on the contract because
it was assuming the risk.
Under the new contract, Blue Cross
will process insurance claims for kids on CHIP, but the state will
assume the risk.
That means if the cost of claims exceeds the
amount of money for the program, the state is on the hook for
covering the cost. However, an overrun hasn't occurred since the
program began in 1999.
Forba said the state will be paying
Blue Cross less for the new administrative contract, but that the
final details have yet to be negotiated. The current contract
expires next month.
Blue Cross officials familiar with the
contract could not be reached for comment Monday.
CHIP is a
federal-state program that offers health insurance to kids who are
not eligible for any other assistance programs. The federal
government covers 80 percent of the program costs.
The 2005
Montana Legislature voted to expand CHIP, upping state funding and
the federal match to finance an additional 3,000 slots in the
program. The program insured about 10,900 kids at the
time.
As more money becomes available for CHIP, the state
should consider increasing the income ceiling for eligibility,
Caferro said.
“It's a good use of tax dollars,” she said,
noting that every state dollar spent on CHIP brings in $4 of federal
money, while insuring children who otherwise don't have health
coverage.
Sen. Mike Cooney, D-Helena, who sponsored a bill
last year to increase the CHIP eligibility, said he'll consider
introducing a similar bill at the 2007 Legislature, if he's
re-elected.
The bill gave the state the power to increase
CHIP eligibility if enough money is available to cover more
kids.
“I have great faith that (the state) would be able to
manage something like that very successfully, and I'd like to give
them the tools to do it,” he said Monday.
“We know that if we
go a little bit above 150 percent (of the federal poverty level), we
can start helping a good chunk of the population that desperately
needs health care.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
advertisement
|